Introduction Video (specific to North America)
HOW IT BEGAN -
Urban sprawl began with the onset of urbanisation; the movement of persons from the rural area to urban areas. These behaviours are often due to the preconceived notions of more opportunities economically, socially and culturally and a better standard of living available in urban districts. The patterns however were geographically specific as the histories of the locations often differed. Typically, the average person did not know what the approaching future entailed but the desire and will-power to persevere until an improved criterion of subsisting was obtained, was the main goal of the migrants.
http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20110111/z.hashemi20110111174130390.jpg
With
all the current advancements of technologies, complex series of innovation and
rise of modern cites and post-modern cities (Hall and Barrett 2012, 39) one would
think that urban migration is a recent phenomenon however the process began in
the latter half of the nineteenth century and the early decades of the
twentieth century in American cities and much earlier in European counterparts
in the decades prior. So as with most origins of development and as with almost
all geographical models, patterns for
sprawl exists in antiquity but the earliest model was based on that of the
capital of England (Hornstein 2005).
In London the wealthiest class had access to more resources such as modes of transportation (Waugh 1995, 251). This made the long commutes from early suburban areas into the city possible. The influx of the rich into the city continued until transportation, roads, and availability of municipal resources improved. When this occurred the relatively affluent people, all of a sudden began building residences outside of the city and as these demographics moved out, less affluent people moved in, causing city centres to be increasingly populated by lower-income individuals. http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-120896605/stock-photo-london-oct-london-sightseeing-bus-on-october-london-uk-open-top-tour-bus-with.html
In London the wealthiest class had access to more resources such as modes of transportation (Waugh 1995, 251). This made the long commutes from early suburban areas into the city possible. The influx of the rich into the city continued until transportation, roads, and availability of municipal resources improved. When this occurred the relatively affluent people, all of a sudden began building residences outside of the city and as these demographics moved out, less affluent people moved in, causing city centres to be increasingly populated by lower-income individuals. http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-120896605/stock-photo-london-oct-london-sightseeing-bus-on-october-london-uk-open-top-tour-bus-with.html
http://yakkersy12geo.blogspot.com/2008/09/hoyts-sector-model.html
With
these trends, by the mid-twentieth century, Europe, Japan and North America had a
mainly urban population, while most people in South America, Africa and Asia
worked in agriculture, and lived in rural settlements close to farmland. At
that time, the world’s largest cities were London and New York. Since then,
people worldwide have moved to towns and cities, in the hope of new opportunities
and the Caribbean was not oblivious to this movement. Caribbean settlements
followed the same outline of urban growth, with different patterns of course,
due to the discrepancies of histories.
EVOLUTION IN TRINIDAD -
In
Trinidad there are many CBDs but the main CBD is the capital, Port-of-Spain. In the
mid-twentieth century there was an influx of persons seeking residence in the
capital also searching for better or enhanced opportunities. Later that century
persons who had climbed to escalator or wealth soon began moving out of the CBD
away from the noise, hustle and bustle of the working class population. The prosperous
followed the main transport routes and colonised attractive areas outside of
the CBD.
2 cars and as I admired them I thought to myself "Wait, isn't Maraval outside or on the rims of the CBD, why does this area drastically contrast that of Lavantille?" It was in that instant I decided to look at the origin of sprawls to find out how it evolved in Trinidad and then I saw how the Hoyt's Sector model delinated settlement patterns around POS. Though I could not do a photoshoot of these private houses (though I wish I could have) it truly got me thinking about this phenomena and what cause these types of patterns along the East and West of the CBD.
Firstly, lower class began inhabiting the CBD until it became so highly populated the
urban landscapes began spreading to underdeveloped areas surrounding. This is
where urban sprawl around the world began. There was a greater need for space
as overpopulation, in relation to persons and resources had met its carrying
capacity. Urban sprawl, the development of urban activities on underdeveloped
areas, in Trinidad became a problem especially sprawl that had no system of
structure to them. Its negative connotation is the generally understood as the “ill
effect” of unregulated development that early real estate advisors and
developers with an interest in land ethics and city planning were trying to
avoid.
Picture showing the shift from agriculture (sugarcane production) to service (Hilton Hotel on the Northern Range)
At this time employment shifted from agriculture to services and manufacturing and many live in areas of manicured landscapes on the very fringe of nature, near agricultural businesses or immediate to lower class residents. These environments have thus had to endure encroachment on their lands without much avail as the population in the sprawls continued to augment. Internationally, some cities have larger populations than the whole of the CARICOM. Most of the largest and fastest growing cities are in Asia, Africa and Latin America (Wilson 2005, 68).
Urban
sprawl began subsequent to the globalisation of urbanisation. It is evidently not
recent as it has been common to every city from the beginning of “urban history”.
It has exploded as an area of focus in urban geography in recent years, with researchers
citing the automobile, governmental single-use zoning laws, accessible
mortgages, and housing subsidies as necessary indicators for the present-day
version of the phenomenon (Bruegmann 2005). Urban sprawl would continue to
impact all corners of the world as most immigrants settle in or around the hob
of business to reduce excess expenditure, particularly on transport.
References
Bruegmann, Robert. 2005. Sprawl:
a Compact History. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hall, T. and H.
Barrett. 2012. Urban Geography. 4th ed. London/ New York: Routledge.
Hornstein,
Jeffrey M. 2005. A Nation of Realtors®: A Cultural History of the
Twentieth-Century American Middle Class. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Waugh, David. 1995. Geography: An Integrated Approach. 2nd ed. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.
Wilson, Mark. 2005. The Caribbean Environment: For CXC Geography. London: Oxford
University Press.
A lot of information! but very well put across...i'm just wondering based on something I read: urban sprawl occurring in places of low density rather that high density..It would be interesting to look into some case studies showing this phenomenon...what other factors can result in urban sprawl besides over-population and the consequent competition for space?
ReplyDeleteThanks, I do a good bit of reading before each post.
DeleteAnd wow, so true, you would not believe as I go further and further in-depth in this topic I have been wondering the same. My more recent posts would be looking a low or well lower-density sprawl in areas around Central Trinidad, such as outside of Caroni, Arena and outside of Arima such as Malabar and Valencia.
Also this post specifically focused on the ORIGINS of sprawl which was mostly because of over-population, however in my post on “LIFE”, I mentioned in the poem that persons might actually voluntary live in urban sprawls because of ease of access to resources (such as transportation and jobs) and because of the opportunities they believe are available in the CBD.
Be careful with how you use the verb colonise -- you may just mean settled or occupied.
ReplyDeleteSpellcheck.
So, why is Maraval different from Laventille? Break this down a little for us, please.